Does the Violence in our media reflect the desire for violence or is it a side effect of its presence in our lives?
The Purpose
The purpose of page is to analyze where violence really comes from. Videogames and movies get blamed for the reason behind school shootings and other violent acts, but there is statistical evidence that just watching a violent movie doesn’t make you violent. In fact, according to a study called “Does Movie Violence Increase Violent Crime?” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 124, no. 2, 2009, pp. 677–734 from Dahl and Della Vinga there is a decrease in violent behavior after watching an intense violent movie. This page’s purpose is to straight out the public opinion, deliver real facts, and figure out why violence is so mainstream now a days. ​
The Final Report
Process
Promotion
I posted my genres on Twitter and Facebook originally, then adding Wattpad instead of continuing the Facebook page. I posted links to my Wix and other sites on each of my accounts (Tweeting a Link to the Facebook and vice versa). Wattpad doesn’t have a social media aspect but I linked to it in my Twitter. This really became my main social media account for promoting. I used the hashtag #MediaOfViolence on the tweets using quotes and stats to tie is back to my campaign of the media spreading the hate in everything we watch. Thus far I’d say Wattpad has been the most successful, I got a few views and reading of my story right after posting. I followed a lot of writers, probably around 144 accounts in order to get attention to my short story further drawing attention to my page. I started sending out tweets linking to my story on approximately April 13th, after finishing my story and figuring out exactly which genres I wanted to do (the game plan before was quite different). After getting no response on Facebook, which was set up just after I started my tweets, I was pointed towards Wattpad, which I made on approximately April 18th.
Reflection
The genres were different because instead of delving into hours of research I got to go with a more creative side and develop a story, which I really enjoyed. A negative difference, for me at least, was having to be stalled by having to wait for a response from my audience. It was a very different experience, having to try something and hope it works and if it doesn’t changing something and just trying and waiting for any sort of response, or even admitting defeat and trying again if there is no response at all. The promoting was definitely far more stressful than researching for me. I really had to consider what my audience would want ad how to get people to interact with my page. During project 2 it was about databases which don’t need interaction or to be prompted, rather the user needs to figure out what to search in order to find what they are looking for. The only similar experience I had was when I interviewed my professor, but she was very easy to work with and responded to emails promptly and within my deadlines. My audience in the remediation of Project 3 had no idea I have deadlines, or even that I’m trying to get into contact with them. It almost felt like I was going to have to put up posters in order to get them to see y page and acknowledge my work, only by them stumbling upon it or looking for it intentionally (as we did our research) would they actually follow me back or read my story. Again, I’d say promoting was the most difficult, the rest flowed pretty well. I enjoyed writing the narrative and the tweets weren’t too hard, it was getting the attention of my audience that proved difficult. Honestly, If I could go back I would have changed my topic to something a bit more generic and gotten more specific as I researched and began project 3 because I started specific which gave me little room to change or explore. Which made me stuck in a box, unable to see if something else or another aspect of my idea would be more effective in answering my initial question.